The Mind of James Donahue Thought Crimes |
|||||
Home | Political Art | Genesis Revised | About James Donahue | Many Things | Shoes | Ships | Sealing Wax | Cabbages | Kings | Sea Is Boiling | Pigs With Wings | Lucifer | Goetia Spirits | Hot Links | Main Page
|
|||||
The Internet; Our Last
Bastion Of Free Expression Is Under Attack By James Donahue February 2005 Wake up Two specific incidents;
the arrest and jailing of a 26-year-old Both cases involved loose
words in Internet chat rooms. Both men were arrested and jailed based on what they wrote to other chatters, and not for having
committed any criminal acts. Edward F. Manuel of That he showed up for
the appointment does not make Manuel a killer. That he had a “device for strangling” in his car doesn’t
tell us much. What was this device, a belt? A pillow? A rope? Are these really weapons for murder? Could it be that Manuel
kept the appointment mostly out of curiosity . . . to see if the woman would show up for such a strange meeting? In a more publicized
case, Gerald Krien of Authorities not only
arrested Krien, but seized his computer after learning that he was allegedly arranging the suicides. Yet even the county sheriff
has admitted the incident could have been a hoax. Both cases may have been
just that….hoaxes or else they were some foolish chat by overzealous participants. By their very nature, chat rooms
are places where people can assume imaginary roles and be as creative as their thoughts will take them. The chatters take
on phony names and remain anonymous. And this allows for lots of freedom of expression, especially when the writer doesn’t
think anybody knows who he or she really is. Since 9-11 and the adoption
of the Patriot Act and other anti-terrorism moves by our government, however, authorities are watching Internet chat rooms,
bugging telephone calls and tuning in on our private lives in ways most people would never suspect. The result of this is
seen in the arrests of two American citizens for thought crimes . . . things they said during chat room role play. Were they crimes? Absolutely not. Will these people be
prosecuted? I believe they will. Unless he can afford a high-priced lawyer, the Krien case, which has already gained national
attention, will probably be highly publicized to the bitter end. The man will end up on the block in the town square for all
to ridicule. The idea is to make an example of him and frighten people out of further free expression on the web. Why would our government
want to do something like this? Does it have anything to do with national security or even crimes against the public? Absolutely
not. All of the activities
in Internet chat rooms are private conversations, somewhat similar to telephone conversations, where anything might be said.
Sometimes, during the heat of the moment, statements are made that lead to the ultimate absurdity. Yet, once they are written
down, or uttered from our lips, someone, somewhere, could be recording them. And if you think nobody
knows who you are, think again. Every computer has an identity that follows it where ever it goes on the web. It is four blocks
of numbers separated by periods called an IP address. Some people can successfully screen the data from their computers to
block access to these IP addresses, but I believe even these screens can be hacked by people who know what they are doing. Also our government has
high tech listening devices monitoring telephone conversations, which now are bounced off satellites circling the Earth. They
are programmed to pick up specific words like “bomb,” or “kill” and “president,” or certain
word combinations, so human ears can be alerted to listen in. Thus the warning is .
. . if you throw careless words into the web, or speak them over your telephone . . . they can be tracked right to your door.
Notice too the all-out
assault on Internet chat rooms by the media. I recently caught part of a one-hour special “news” report on one
of the television networks that examined how people are becoming addicted to Internet pornography and sex chat rooms, where
they can have cyber sexual encounters with total strangers in the privacy of their homes. The story suggested that
people are having lives and marriages ruined by their addictions to these sexual encounters. People are being fired from their
jobs after getting caught visiting the sites on the job. And psychologists testified they are working with more and more people
who want to break away from this new American addiction. It was compared to drug
addiction. What amazed me was that
so many people were willing to get their jollies by talking so openly about their sexual experiences in these chat rooms,
and tell how the system has ruined their lives. I suspect they were hired actors and the whole story is a great big hoax. Every red blooded American
male, and I suspect a lot of women too, have visited these pornography sites and explored the chat rooms. Sex is of great
interest to everybody, especially people living in a religious society where the subject is taboo, and the very word SEX is
considered a four-letter word. Yet I disagree that Internet
sex is addictive. While it may be a kick for the moment, after a while the thrill is gone. We go on to more interesting and
more stimulating subject matter, which we find in abundance on the World Wide Web. That is the real bottom
line to all of this government monkey business. There are people in high places that want to control the Internet because
it is the last place left where there is a free exchange of information. Right now we can say,
post or express any opinion we wish on our personal blog page, or website, even if we are completely wrong. We can visit each
other’s sites and read the material there, and form our own opinions as to what we wish to accept or reject. It is a
public information system that is unparalleled in world history. The government controlled
newspapers in If people have a cause,
their site reflects it. Those who disagree with
George W. Bush can say so, and poke fun at every move our president makes. Those that support Mr.
Bush can do this too. Although to be frank, it is rare when I find sites that support Bush these days. This is what is making
a paranoid government very nervous. This is why people in high places would like to either shut down the Internet, or if nothing
else, attempt to get it under control. It is hard to get the
masses in lock step if protesters are allowed to speak freely in a forum as open as this. The destruction of artistic
expression has always marked the downfall of nations throughout history. The last bastion of expression
is the Internet. This may well be the only glue still holding things together. When they succeed in
building enough public support to control the web, or even worse, close it down, we can all shed a tear. It means the flame
that was briefly a bright shining light in a bleak world, will be dimmed forever. |
||||
|
||||