Can Science Ever Manipulate Evolution?
By
James Donahue
Back
in 1997 Dr. Alejandro Zaffaroni, Dr. Willem Stemmer, Dr. Russell Howard and Isaac Stein collaborated to found a research company
called Maxygen. This company, located in Redwood City, California, has successfully used a system of molecular breeding to
create evolutionary alterations that the founders say has a potential commercial application in agriculture, veterinary medicine,
enzyme/chemical processes and human therapeutics.
From
this initial company, Zaffaroni has founded spin-off companies that include ALZA Corporation, DNAX Research Institute, Affymax,
Affymetrix Symyx Technologies and Alexza, all active in the commercial development of discoveries made within the confines
of Maxygen.
So
how can we best explain the research that has gone on within the walls of Maxygen? One description, offered by Wikipedia,
said researchers “exploited proprietary recombined-based technologies for creating genetic diversity, known as its Molecular
Breeding directed evolution platform.” We suppose it would take a genetic researcher or perhaps a rocket scientist to
understand just what that means.
The
article went on to explain that the technologies brought about “the generation of millions of variant genes and proteins”
which were then screened to find things of possible commercial interest.
What
caught our attention was that the Wikipedia writer stated that the “laboratory process mimics the powerful natural process
of evolution.” And there lies the key to our interest in what is going on in Redwood.
Researchers
appear to be using artificial methods, called biochemistry, to created genetic alterations or mutations. Each mutation is
then closely studied to see if any can be developed for commercial application.
There
has been a long-standing belief that while mutations occur in nature, they are rarely, if ever, successful. Calves born with
two heads, cats with six claws on each foot and other mutant variations usually cannot be passed on. Animals born from cross
breeding also fit into this category. Most die young or if they grow to maturity, they are sterile and cannot reproduce another
of their kind.
Consequently,
the research occurring at Maxygen laboratories must be something like looking for a needle in a haystack. Only with the help
of computer technology can a team of researchers even consider this kind of search.
As
of 2009 the only potential development emerging from the Maxygen laboratory is something called Maxy-G34, a drug still under
study that may, if approved for medical use, treat chemotherapy-induced destruction of white blood cells. The drug appears
to stimulate bone marrow to produce more white blood cells.
Maxy-G34
is still in early phases of development and it could be several years before it is available for patient use, if it ever gets
that far. If successful, the drug could be profitable, but the stakes are high. As of the end of 2007 the company reported
a loss of $11.7 million. Much of the money came from government and private grants.
The
Redwood scientists are obviously sticking their necks out by devoting their lives to molecular breeding to produce mutant
genes of any value to mankind. We might compare the work to panning for gold. It might take years to find what they are looking
for, but if they ever find that nugget, eureka!