The Idiocy Of Staging Wars That Cannot Be Won
By
James Donahue
Just
after 9-11, when George W. Bush launched his “war on terrorism,” we expressed a concern about the rash of so-called
national wars against ideologies that lead down endless tunnels and never finding completion.
The
thought then, and it has not changed one iota since, is that the war on terror looks much like America’s
drug war, launched by the Nixon Administration.
After
more than 20 years, the drug was continues, and we are no closer to winning it today than when it began. The Bush war on terror
began with our attack on Afghanistan, was carried into Iraq, and this war also rages, some six years after we physically sent
troops into battle against it.
The
problem is that these are not wars at all. They are political assaults against invisible enemies. The people we are fighting
can be working and living beside us, who look and act like us, but do not share the same political, social or religious beliefs.
Our
neighbors might support the right to smoke marijuana in the privacy of their home, or carry a secret objection to the capitalistic
system with which the United States does
its business. The Moslem, on the other hand, may also live in our neighborhood, but he or she usually carry their religious
belief on their sleeves, so-to-speak, since they choose to dress and appear differently than the social norm. And since we
were attacked my Moslem terrorists on 9-11, we have made the gross mistake of misjudging all Moslems as terrorists.
Our
troops stationed in Afghanistan and Iraq have had the problem of dealing with determining just who the enemy is among
the farmers, shopkeepers and general citizens on the street. This is a new kind of gorilla warfare, where the enemy might
be a woman, or even a child who walks into a military check-point with a bomb strapped on their waist. That they would blow
themselves up to make their point is a strong political statement, one that our military, and our leadership, would be wise
in attempting to understand.
This
kind of warfare can wear down the most gallant of soldiers. And, indeed, it has. We are now hearing reports of mass suicide
rates . . . some say up to 1,000 attempts a month . . . now occurring among the troops in Iraq.
There is a reason this conflict is leaving so many of our troops mentally troubled.
This kind of warfare is covert in its nature. There is no line of battle, with soldiers from two forces standing
in mortal combat. You can't bomb this kind of enemy because even though you might identify one or two so-called soldiers,
you can't kill him without taking out a school filled with innocent children, or a street filled with innocent pedestrians.
This is the kind of war where the enemy can emerge like a cockroach from the woodwork and do
a lot of damage, killing a lot of people. When the commitment is so powerful it turns the enemy into willing suicide bombers,
the deck is always stacked against us.
The Bush Administration
has identified Osama bin Laden as the mastermind behind the World
Trade Center and Pentagon bomb
attacks. But he was the leader of a small and isolated gang of “terrorists” who skillfully pulled off one of the
most brilliant attacks against the United States since the Japanese bombed
Pearl Harbor. But we never went after bin Laden. We have been attacking all of the wrong
people and places and Osama still remains free and in hiding somewhere in the mountains of Afghanistan
or Pakistan.
We have sent our Naval ships, aircraft, troops and ground weapons in a show of great military strength. Yet our most
sophisticated weaponry will not flush out gorilla fighters who have entrenched themselves into the rugged terrain in such
a way they cannot be separated from the natives.
Afghanistan is not only a place filled with
arid rocks, narrow cuts, caves and other things considered a soldier's nightmare, it is a nation that has been steeped in
warfare for so many years, the Taliban are skilled in defending their homeland. Going in there with ground troops has proven
to be an exercise in futility.
And
if Bush thought our assault on Iraq would
be a “piece of cake,” he had a surprise coming. While not hiding in difficult mountainous terrain, these gorilla
fighters are concealed in the worst possible places, on the open street with all of the innocent citizenry. How do we fight
that?
Consider
the best case scenario and say the Afghanistan forces in the Northern Alliance, who have been fighting the Taliban, help us slip in and nab Bin Laden in one brilliant
military action. Indeed, such a move might even help improve the image of our disgraced president at this late stage of his
failed term in office. But it will not be the end of the war.
The fact that someone like Osama bin Laden exists and
has followers means that there are a lot of people in this world who think just like him. They are people who, for either
religious or political reasons, hate the United States with such fervor they are willing to strap bombs around themselves
just to kill as many Americans as possible.
The
atrocities we have committed in Iraq, and Afghanistan since 9-11 have, indeed, stirred many more Islamic people to think
just like that.
Hatred like that will not go away with the capture of Osama bin Laden. All we will accomplish is martyrdom, which
in itself could create even more reasons for that invisible enemy to want to attack, maim and kill Americans.
Terrorism,
like drugs, has always been with us. It is just more visible now because we are living in an overpopulated and polluted world,
and on a dying planet. There is an unseen conflict going on now as people run out of the essentials for living, like food,
water and shelter. People living on the open ground, with no food, clothing and shelter, can easily be persuaded to hate neighbors
who appear to be living in overabundance.
And this is how Americans appear to many of the poor and destitute people
of the world.