The Mind of James Donahue Kyoto Coverup |
|||||
Home | Political Art | Genesis Revised | About James Donahue | Many Things | Shoes | Ships | Sealing Wax | Cabbages | Kings | Sea Is Boiling | Pigs With Wings | Lucifer | Goetia Spirits | Hot Links | Main Page
|
|||||
New Political Trickery
By Our Toxic President By James Donahue July 28, 2005 Something called a “Beyond
Kyoto Climate Pact” is expected to be announced today by the Bush Administration. The pact, a five-nation
agreement to combat global warming through new technology, appears to be an effort at appeasing environmental groups that
have been critical of the China, India, Australia
and South Korea are joining the United States in announcing an agreement to work together to develop new energy technology
that will be earth friendly and reduce pollutants in the soil, air and water. President Bush has opposed
the While the new pact sounds
like a good idea, it is not a new idea. Engineers have been attempting to find new and less polluting energy sources for years
without much success. While the research continues, however, something needs to be done now to stop the runaway emissions
of not only the gasses from burning carbon fuels, but the soot that billows daily from industrial smoke stacks around the
world. It is clear by now that
the Earth is warming up from the effects of these pollutants. Dynamic weather changes, melting ice caps, deadly heat waves
and extreme winters are already ravaging out planet. Powerful hurricanes and typhoons are marching out from the middle of
our oceans and giant tornados are ripping through the midsections of our landscape. Instead of monsoons, parts of the world
now experience heavy flooding. Areas that once enjoyed moderate rainfall are now so drought stricken they are turning to desert. It should be clear to
world leaders that there is no time to wait for technology to solve this major dilemma. Immediate and drastic steps to stop
the insanity must be taken now and even the The alternative energy
systems in place today are equally as flawed as the simple burning of carbon fuels. Nuclear power plants,
for example, produce tons of deadly radioactive waste that must be stored someplace uninhabitable for millions of years. No
one can agree on just where such a place can be located, except for sending it into space or perhaps the moon. The generating
plants themselves have proven to be unstable enough that they can overheat and go into nuclear meltdown, thus poisoning entire
cities and private property located within miles of these sites. The production of gasoline/electric
combination vehicles has been a promising idea for future cars. That these cars are capable of utilizing their gasoline power
and their own motion to keep their batteries charged is a clever way of utilizing energy to peak efficiency. But such cars
still need gasoline, a carbon fuel, and electric generation from power plants operating on carbon fuels to stay charged. The Bush concept of developing
cars to operate on hydrogen sounds good at first glance. But wheat few realize is that hydrogen must be separated from other
gasses before it becomes a power source. The process of separation uses more energy than the amount of energy that can be
produced from the product. And that energy will probably come from the burning of fossil fuels. Solar power works with
the sun shines, but it requires large collectors that would clutter the landscape if we all shifted to it. Wind power works when
the wind blows. But this also has proven to be a somewhat unstable and unreliable energy source. Water power has already been utilized for generating power in areas where it is available. It is old technology. The newest ideas involve
cow power. Farmers raising large numbers of livestock are developing elaborate waste sites that collect and then burn methane
gas to produce electricity for not only operating the farm, but selling the surplus to the local power companies. And that is about it.
Unless somebody invents a real perpetual motion machine, there are few other ideas out there for making energy. Thus the new energy pact
is a farce. It offers no hope by this administration that anything will be done to salvage our dying planet. |
||||
|
||||