Americans
Were Duped Into Past Wars – Let’s Stop The Insanity
By James Donahue
Because of my interest in naval history I have been acutely aware of two troublesome
facts about the two great world wars. I believe the United States was skillfully drawn into both conflicts. Certain people
in high places used major events to occur and then used them to inflame public opinion.
It happened again after 9-11. I also believe the Korean and Vietnam Wars were designed
to help fuel the industrial military complex created during World War II. In fact, Congress never officially declared war
on any other world nation since World War II. Both Korea and Vietnam were declared “police actions” at the time
they were fought.
Looking
back in history, many historians have reason to believe that the sinking of the Lusitania and the Japanese attack on Pearl
Harbor were allowed to happen for political reasons.
Most historians agree that the destruction
of the British liner Lusitania by German submarine U-20 on May 7, 1915, was a major contributory event that stirred America
to enter the First World War. The sinking killed 1,198 men, women and children, including 128 Americans. The passengers on
that ship ignored a warning published by Germany in various New York newspapers that the liner would be attacked if it took
its fateful trip into the war zone surrounding the British Isles.
Had the American people been given all of the facts about this incident, they might have been more inclined
to join Germany in the war against England, and perhaps turn the course of history.
The Lusitania appeared to be a luxury liner, but in reality it was a navy cruiser in disguise. The British
government commissioned the construction of this ship. Her decks were carefully designed with gun mounts. Some believe her
guns were stored below deck on the day it sank. While it carried passengers on the upper decks, there is evidence that the
Lusitania also was operating as a military cargo ship. Some say that one of the reasons it sank within 20 minutes after a
single torpedo from Kapitan-Leutnant Walther Schwieger's U-boat hit the hull was that the vessel was laden with ammunition.
The bombs and bullets exploded, blowing the bottom out of the ship.
Yet another curious event made the Lusitania a virtual "sitting duck." Because German U-boats were known
to be patrolling for several miles off the coast, the British Navy was escorting friendly ships in and out of the nation's
ports of call. Yet on the day the Lusitania was scheduled to arrive, the naval escort vessels were called away. This order
was given by the first lord of the admiralty who was none other than Sir Winston Churchill.
Why would such an order be given, especially after Germany specifically warned of
plans to try to sink the Lusitania? I suggest that this ship and all of the people who perished with it were sacrificed in
a daring effort to get the United States involved in the war. Both sides were at an impasse until the United States entered
the war in 1917. Our forces helped turn the tide and Germany surrendered within the year.
I can't help but wonder if there would have been a Hitler or a Nazi movement in
Germany if England had lost the war. The German defeat followed by the Great Depression plunged Germany into economic collapse.
This set the stage for a radical new form of government.
The
war was again raging in Europe in 1941 and there were many Americans who wanted to get the U. S. war machine cranked up for
the inevitable conflict. But America has always been slow to go to war when the decision is left to Congress. Politicians
don't make hard decisions like that without first knowing that their constituents are whole-heartedly behind them. Modern
presidents can order troops into battle without first getting an act of Congress, but that wasn't the case in 1917 and again
in 1941. President Roosevelt had to wait until the majority of the people wanted to go to war.
The Japanese attack on Pearl Harbor was the perfect solution to this problem. It
plunged America into war with not only Japan, but with Germany and Italy within days.
I have personally talked to former Navy men who survived the Pearl Harbor bombing.
They said the Navy knew the Japanese were coming but did nothing to stop them. It is public record that the 181 approaching
Japanese aircraft were on naval radar screens in time to launch a counter attack, but the order was never given. Consequently,
the 151 U. S. planes that might have warded off the attack were destroyed on the ground.
The
attack sank or damaged eight outdated battleships and a fleet of smaller ships, including some old four-stacker destroyers
that had outlived their usefulness. Unfortunately, the raid also left 2,343 U. S. service personnel dead, 960 more missing,
and 1,272 wounded.
The Navy's fleet of aircraft
carriers and submarines were conveniently out to sea and survived to launch a counter attack against Japan. Naval leaders
knew even in 1941 that future wars would be mostly won with the help of carriers and submarines, not slow moving, coal burning
dreadnoughts, cruisers and other surface vessels. Were these old ships and their crews sacrificed for political reasons?
Other than the fact that Hitler poised a serious world threat in 1941, what other political reasons
would there have been? Remember that the world was still struggling from a serious depression in the 1930s when the Axis powers
began rattling sabers. A world war was a perfect solution to getting a sluggish economy stimulated again. Generating a Second
World War worked like magic.
It is said that
the United States was not geared up for the war that fell on us so quickly. But don't let the history books fool you. We made
a conversion of our factories into a giant war machine in a remarkably short time. It is obvious that a lot of planning had
been going on before the war actually started.
World War II worked out so well for us that the
United States was turned almost overnight into the most powerful nation in the world.
Think about these things when
you hear all of the tough talk and saber rattling going on these days between the United States and Middle Eastern nations.
Many economists have been concerned about the current economic crisis that has left millions of people in the United States
out of work and many of them even out of their homes. You can bet that the people in charge are thinking about launching another
world conflict. It has always been the formula for jump starting sluggish economic situations.
Conditions
are different today than they were in 1941, however. This overpopulated world has used up its resources. Also we are all encumbered
by a great nuclear arsenal possessed by not only the United States and Russia, but also China, Israel, England, Pakistan,
India, France and other smaller nations like North Korea and possibly Iran.
The
next war could easily turn into a fiery holocaust leading to the extinction of all life on the planet.