Planting Trees Won't Save Us From Global Heating
By James Donahue
For years scientists have lamented the destruction of global rain forests because it
was argued that trees play a major role in consuming carbon dioxide and they generate oxygen, thus maintaining a harmony for
life to exist on Earth.
When world leaders hammered out an agreement at Kyoto, Japan, about a decade ago, to
fight global warming by reducing industrial carbon emissions, a major portion of the package included a heavy emphasis on
saving existing forests and planting more trees.
The argument was that forests provided "sinks" that consume large amounts of carbon
dioxide. That belief caused Russia, Japan and Canada to demand concessions for their forest industries as part of the Kyoto
protocol. The Clinton administration demanded tree planting as part of the agreement to save costs for the US economy, which
Now, as world leaders gather to consider new and even tougher agreements to collectively
battle the warming of the planet and the threat of drastic climate change, scientists are beginning to have doubts about the
effectiveness of trees in stopping the heating or consuming enough carbon dioxide to make a difference.
A recent study by European scientists indicates that in addition to consuming carbon
dioxide and emitting oxygen, older forests also are heavy sources of methane, yet another form of global heating gas.
In the study, published in the journal Nature, Frank Keppler of the Max Planck
Institute in Germany found that living plants, dried leaves and grass emit large amounts of methane as they decompose.
Yet another study by Duke University, in North Carolina, suggests that a mass planting
of new trees all over the globe will not be enough to mop up the carbon dioxide now floating around in the atmosphere.
William Schlesinger, a university spokesman, said the study "throws doubt on nations
such as the US who have carbon sequestration as their only strategy for dealing with the problem."
The buildup of carbon dioxide has been mostly caused by automobile exhausts, industrial,
and especially coal-burning electric generating plants. This, combined with the loss of large blocks of rain forest all around
the world to make way for more people and more agricultural operation, has been a key factor in upsetting the delicate balance
the planet has maintained in making Earth a habitable place for life.
The destruction of the forests has truly been a major factor in the equation. But trees
are not the only solution to this complex puzzle.