Experienced Journalists Hanging Heads In Shame
By James Donahue
The first sign that something was out of whack with the "reliable" mainstream media was the day NBC
Anchor Brian Williams was caught fabricating a story about taking fire while riding in a military helicopter in Afghanistan.
He apologized on air the next day, but appears to have lost his job over the incident anyway.
As a long time journalist now retired, I could not imagine what got into Williams’ head that
made him make up such a story. As much as I admired his work over the years, I could not argue with the decision to let him
go over such an act of misconduct. False news stories were something journalists always tried to avoid at all costs. When
we made even the slightest error in reporting a story, a correction was published the following day. Explaining to the editor
was always the worst of it. But the old addage: "Everybody makes mistakes" always prevailed.
But was what Williams did a mistake, or was it done intentionally . . . perhaps to beef up the nightly
news by adding a personal flare about war reporting? Actually, even if Williams did have a bullet whiz over his head his experience
didn't hold a candle to the real war correspondents in the Middle East wars, Vietnam, Korea or World War II. A lot
of guys like Ernie Pyle, James Hunter, Larry Burrows and Joseph Morton are among the many to have given their lives trying
to get the story while on the front lines with the fighting soldiers.
After Brian Williams, it seems as if the media everywhere is suddenly ripe with manufactured sensational
news. For examples: There was the story about the chickenpox epidemic allegedly started by an infected person pushing through
the crowds at California’s Disneyland. The stories sparked a widespread campaign to get everybody vaccinated against
chickenpox. Something seemed wrong about that story from the get-go. Older news veterans like myself remember the days when
every kid in the neighborhood had both chicken pox and the mumps. Our parents seemed to urge us to get exposed so we fought
off these bugs as children, when immune systems were strong, and we enjoyed life-long built-in resistance after that.
The scare stories about a so-called "epidemic" of chicken pox and the need for everybody to rush off
and get vaccinated appears to have been manufactured on behalf of Big Pharma which had an over-abundance of chickenpox vaccine
stockpiled. There were something like 70 cases of chickenpox recorded in all. And it was discovered that a lot of them were
people who had received the chickenpox vaccine. It seems that the vaccine gives patients a mild case of the disease. That's
how we build up immunity. In some cases, the vaccine proved to be totally ineffective. Did the media purposefully dupe us
with this story?
Next we read about arsenic being found in wines produced in California. After a day or two of dealing
with such an unthinkable story we find out it was all a hoax. It was a manufactured sensational story that spread like wildfire.
The California grape growers who turn out some of the finest wines are struggling enough this year because of climate change
and the ongoing drought. They didn't need to be hit with this kind of publicity, especially when it was all a lie.
Rolling Stone Magazine, long one of the most trusted publications involving real investigative journalism
in the U.S., has now been caught publishing a manufactured story about women being commonly raped at fraternity parties on
American college campuses. The fraternities collectively did their own research, found out the story was not only untrue,
but the reporter who wrote the story failed to properly research the facts. Rolling Stone has retracted the story. The damage
to Rolling Stone and the American media in general is difficult at this point to measure.
It is commonly known that Fox News has been doing this kind of wild sensational editorializing for
years and getting away with it. Instead of rejecting Fox as a false source of balance news, that network has only gained in
popularity. It is hard for we in the field of journalism to understand this. It seems that Americans are either too dumb to
recognize that they are being fed political garbage, or they are addicted to the taste of it.
Is the success enjoyed by Fox the cause of the irresponsible reporting that is popping up in other
competitive publications and networks?
With this going on, who can Americans trust to get straight and honest news reports? There is great
danger in all of this. When the big corporations control both the media and the government, the general public can be persuaded
to believe just about anything.
For example, 9-11 should not have led the nation to war in the Middle East without first having an
in-depth investigation by impartial researchers . . . preferably responsible news reporters . . to get the facts as to what
really happened and who was behind the attack. As it was, the Bush Administration raced off to battle first in Afghanistan
and then in Iraq. The response perhaps did more damage in the long run than anybody expected. We appear to now be engaged
in perpetual warfare in the Middle East, much to the delight of the military industrial complex. A lot of people are getting
very rich building and selling the machines of war these days at the cost of thousands if not millions of lives.
The contemporary news reporters have fallen down on the job. So now we have a few "whistle-blowers"
popping out of the woodwork, attempting to inform the public as to what has really been going on.
Instead of praising them, people like Edward Snowden and Bradley Manning are hunted down like criminals
because they dared to reveal what is now classified as "state secrets" that people in high places don’t want us to know.