The Mind of James Donahue Wild 2 |
|||||
Home | Aaron's Magick | Political Art | Genesis Revised | About Aaron | About James Donahue | Many Things | Shoes | Ships | Sealing Wax | Cabbages | Kings | Sea Is Boiling | Pigs With Wings | Lucifer | Goetia Spirits | Hot Links | Page 2 | Main Page
|
|||||
Viewing A Comet Up Close
And Personal By James Donahue When I was a kid gazing
with awe at the stars, I never dreamed that we might have the technology to send a camera attached to a rocket to other planets
and certainly not to a passing comet. But that is what recently
happened. To me, the fact that we photographed comet “Wild 2” up close is still an awe-inspiring event, although
the media treated it as if it was but a novelty. Something unique to capture a news hole for the day and then to be forgotten. I’m sure a few
NASA scientists and other astronomers didn’t think of it that way. Comets have always been
among the mysteries of space. They seem to travel in their own orbital path, some of them visiting our solar system once in
long periods of time, perhaps 50 to 100 years. Others come and go once in recorded history. That they light up the
sky in their passing, usually spewing a long lighted tail, only adds to the lure of watching comets come and go. Questions like what comets
are made of, where they come from, why they assume such wide orbits and why they spit out material that glistens as a passing
tail, obviously prompted scientists to send the Stardust spacecraft off in 1999 to get a close-up look at Wild 2 as it passed
through our solar system. Not only did Stardust
get close-up pictures of this comet, it also scooped up samples of the “dust” and is scheduled to bring it back
for analysis by sometime in 2006. What the pictures showed
at fly-by left more questions than answers. The comet appeared as a solid object, with broad mesas, craters, pinnacles and
canyons. But it also was spitting out material at supersonic speeds from jets clearly visible on the comet’s surface. In a paper published
in the journal Science, Astronomer Donald Brownlee of Brownlee described the
nucleus of the comet as a clump of hard dirt that reacts to particles that strike it because there is no gravity to keep the
dust on its surface. But if he is right, how
can scientists say that a big lump of dirt, flying at such speed through the universe, is billions of years old? While we now have a description
of a comet, Stardust has done little to really explain what it is, what it is made of, and why it does what it does. But then, it is always
fun to have a few mysteries around to keep us guessing. |
||||
|
||||