The Mind of James Donahue Black Boots In The Night |
|||||
Home | Aaron's Magick | Political Art | Genesis Revised | About Aaron | About James Donahue | Many Things | Shoes | Ships | Sealing Wax | Cabbages | Kings | Sea Is Boiling | Pigs With Wings | Lucifer | Goetia Spirits | Hot Links | Page 2 | Main Page
|
|||||
By James Donahue December 2004 A recent U.S. Supreme
Court decision makes it legal for police officers to arrest citizens without expressed cause. The justices voted 8-0
to throw out a case against a While the court found
that the recording was legal, they ruled that the arrest was still valid because the officers could have arrested the motorist
for impersonating a police officer. Details of the incident
were not included in the report. In his opinion, Justice
Antonin Scalia said the police were not required to provide a reason for arresting the man as long as they had probable cause
to do it. “While it is assuredly
good police practice to inform a person of the reason for his arrest at the time he is taken into custody, we have never held
that to be constitutionally required,” Scalia wrote. The ruling clearly puts
more power than ever into the hands of police and thus becomes a shield against false-arrest lawsuits. While the constitutional
amendments included in the Bill of Rights protect against illegal and improper search and seizure, Justice Scalia is technically
correct in stating that the Sixth Amendment does not require a police officer to give a reason at the time a person is taken
into custody. The amendment states
that anyone accused of a crime must be “informed of the nature and cause of the accusation” prior to his or her
appearance before a judge. It implies that it is the duty of the arresting officer to explain, but does not specifically put
the burden on the officer. That the court declined to clarify this issue and, instead, supported what most citizens might consider
an improper police arrest, leaves the door open for excessive police harassment of citizenry without legal recourse. It raises
still higher the specter of a people ruled by the iron fist of an authoritative government. That our courts are ruling
in favor of unwarranted searches and bugging of homes and offices in the interest of Homeland Security, anti-terrorism and
the war on drugs has already eroded our constitutional freedoms to a startling level. This action by a court
that chose to put our current Republican administration in power in 2000, has thus moved us another step closer to a totalitarian
state. |
||||
|
||||