Bush Victory Overpowered
By James Donahue
According to native legends,
George W. Bush should not have defeated John Kerry on Nov. 2.
His name was wrong, he
was shorter than Kerry, the Washington Redskins lost their final home game before the election and Burke’s Peerage declared
that the Bush links to royal blood lines were not as strong as those of his Democratic opponent.
All of these things were
clear indicators of voter choices in the process of choosing presidents in the past, historical records show.
If you study the names
of the men elected to the office, a lot of them had double letters in their names, like Kerry. There also were names like
Roosevelt, Hoover, Kennedy, “Bill” Clinton and “Jimmy” Carter. We also recall
names like Adams (with two A’s), Dwight D. Eisenhower (two D’s and three E’s)
and Nixon (with two N’s divided by an X).
Using this formula, we
can see that George W. Bush, with two G’s and two E’s in his name, defeated Al Gore in 2000. But beating John
Kerry was another matter. Those double R’s in Kerry’s name should have been a more powerful voter draw than the
separated double letters in the Bush name. Obviously they weren’t quite enough.
Popular folklore also
suggested that taller candidates usually won presidential elections. Bush, or at least his political advisors, may have been
very aware of this because they went to great lengths to make sure he stood on an elevated platform so that he appeared as
tall as the 6-foot, 4-inch Kerry during the three televised debates. The difference, however, was noticeable when the two
men met on stage to shake hands.
Bush stands at 5 feet,
The other omen: the incumbent
president always lost if the Redskins lost their final home football game before Election Day. It has happened since 1936,
almost since the game was invented. The team lost to the Green Bay Packers 28-14, at home, on Oct. 31.
And lastly, Burke’s
Peerage found that Kerry is a distant cousin to Britain’s
Queen Elizabeth. Thus he has more blue blood in his veins than any presidential candidate in U.S. history. But that didn’t influence voters either.
Religious fanatics might
say it was God’s will that Bush was elected. Indeed, there were esoteric powers involved in the events going on in America on Election Day, but it probably didn’t come
like a lightning bolt from the sky.
As warned by this writer,
and by our son, psychic viewer Aaron C. Donahue, the nation was being watched and judged by supernatural powers during this
fateful event. The fact that the election drew such a heavy turnout of voters . . . sometimes over 70 percent of the registered
numbers . . . indicates that people knew it was an important decision, if only on a subconscious level.
That we chose wrong marked
us for a bleak future.